a diversity of patristic views on this issue and that many fathers, including some Gavrilyuk deems orthodox, employed (qualified) expressions of divine suffering.22 Noting “ ‘impassibilist’ positions proposed by some of the Fathers that seem akin to what would, in modern theology, be termed ‘passibilism,’ ” Anastasia Philippa Scrutton similarly concludes, “Some modern forms of passibilism may not be as much of a break from tradition as has generally been perceived.”23 If this is right, some patristic